Site icon ShepwayVox Dissent is not a Crime

Fraud? We’ll leave you decide that.

When information that our Council holds must be published freely, charging for it could be considered fraud.

The Local Government Transparency Code 2015 makes it clear at page 15, para 35 that Local authorities, including Folkestone & Hythe District Council,  must publish details of all land and building assets including:

This would include any option agreements the Council may have with any landowner/farmer inside the Otterpool Park boundary

So our public face sent an Environmental Information Request to the Council in late August 2018. It asked for all the land the Council had future commitments on, inside the Otterpool Park boundary. In their initial acknowledgement the response states:

This policy was introduced by the former CEO Alistair Stewart and the Council and announced last Sept 2017. It became an active policy on the 1st April 2018.

In early September 2018 the Council responded and stated:

The fact that a fee is necessary demonstrates, we believe, that the Council holds information regarding land inside the Otterpool Park boundary.

The Council response indicates they hold the requested information and wish to charge a fee. How can information; which according to the Local Government Transparency Code 2015 MUST BE PUBLISHED freely by the Council, allow the Council to make a charge?

Under the Fraud Act 2006 s3 it states:

The Council is under a legal duty to disclose the information requested in the Environmental Information Request, as the Local Government Transparency Code 2015 says it MUST be published. The fact the Council must publish then does NOT allow them to make a charge. So the council could be seen to be making a financial gain by requesting a fee and committing fraud by failing to disclose the requested information.

In the last few days the Council have announced that Folkestone & Hythe District Council’s Cabinet will on the 18th Oct 2018 consider:

Now it is clear from the language used by the Council “options for securing “further parcels of land” within the site of the proposed Otterpool Park Garden Town” makes it clear they must already have parcels of land agreed with landowners. This is supported by the fact they wish to charge our public face for this requested information.

So this is why we believe in our opinion the Council may be committing fraud. However, we are not lawyers and we are sure that the Council will give some explanation as to why they are charging for information which should be free and publicly available to us all. However, as always we’ll leave you to decide if the Council may be committing fraud.

The Shepwayvox Team – Dissent is NOT a Crime.

Exit mobile version