Site icon ShepwayVox Dissent is not a Crime

Stainer under Restraint?

Restraint isn’t the word that comes to mind when considering the much battered and bruised Michael Stainer as he fights to retain control of the Grand. Fifteen times in the last five years, fourteen in the last two, he has gone to court with applications and appeals, and has lost every single one. He has used three barristers, two firms of solicitors and unknown hours of court time with his flat earth approach to legal reasoning. He’s even chased High Court Sheriffs off the premises, claiming that there are no moveable assets belonging to Hallam Estates, the freeholder.

This obsessive litigation might now be coming to an end. On October 27th, His Honour Judge Adam Johnson, dismissed an application from Hallam, represented by their ‘consultant’, Michael Stainer, to stave off bankruptcy. This resulted from Hallam’s failure to pay £9624 of court costs awarded to the Association of Residents in the Grand (AORG) in July 2019.

The Judge used the dreaded words;

This was the third such dismissal, the others being:

This is serious. Hallam Estates and Stainer have crossed the threshold of acceptable use of judicial time with meritless applications. This can then lead to them being prevented from any further applications to the Court unless they first seek and obtain permission. This is known as a Civil Restraint Order.

In a recent case before Mr Justice Zacaroli, who has rejected three applications from Hallam already, slapped just such an Extended Civil Restraint Order on an applicant. He stated:

In this case, the applicant had made seven applications. Hallam has, made fifteen, all unsuccessful and three certified as “totally without merit.” So can we expect to see Hallam’s and Stainer’s name on this published list before long? We think so!

The Shepway Vox Team

The Velvet Voices of Dissent

Exit mobile version