Public playgrounds are an iconic symbol of childhood. The first playgrounds were a German invention built to teach children how to play. 1859 saw the first British playground in Manchester. 1907 saw the introduction of playgrounds in America because President Roosevelt considered roads to be unsafe.
The first playground equipment consisted of slides, swings, roundabouts and climbing frames. Traditional playground equipment focused on physical development leaving very little opportunity for creativity. Adventure and junk playgrounds were developed to encourage imagination and free play.
There are more than forty public playgrounds spread out across the Folkestone & Hythe District.
Recently a proposal for a Roman Fort destination public playground (plan pictured) was mooted to possibly become a permanent fixture on Jock’s Pitch on the East Cliff, in Harbour Ward, Folkestone. However, this proposal, first mentioned on Facebook by Town Cllr Mary Lawes, has polarized the Harbour Ward community.
Recently a residents meeting to took place at St Peter’s Church, The Durlocks, on Monday 4th Oct at 7pm. The meeting was attended by eighty five people, not all from Harbour Ward, to discuss the proposed Roman Fort public playground on Jock’s Pitch on the East Cliff of Folkestone. Much was said, especially the plans are just a proposal, and the community would need to raise around £300,000, to turn the proposal into a reality. Yet even though the idea remains on paper, polarized groups for and against the proposed playground have emerged.
So apart from play teaching children to understand risk taking and extend their skills, develop physical and emotional capacities and challenge themselves, children find out very quickly that it is rude to push in and that turn-taking is very important. They learn to make friends and how to deal with conflict under the watchful eye of their parents. Play is an essential part of civic infrastructure, just as important as pavements are for pedestrians. But the benefits don’t just stop there. It’s well known that living near a park, public garden or playing fields can add an average of £2,500 to the price of your property, according to official data published by the Official of National Statistics. That data is two years old and it’s now reckoned it adds up to £4,000 to the price of a property, so what’s not to want when your house value rises just because of its location?
Now many of you might not realize, “Folkestone is a divided town“. This is a statement made in the Folkestone Place Plan Urban Appraisal at page 10 of the document which states:
Four areas are in the top 10% most deprived in the country and struggle particularly with low incomes and high unemployment and crime. In Folkestone Central and Harbour wards, 30% ofchildren live in low income households compared to 20% across FHD and 18% nationally… which is resulting in a stark disparity in health, wellbeing and quality of life outcomes between local people
Regular readers of Shepway Vox would know these stats should not come as a shock, as child poverty in each district of Kent has grown over the last five years, according to data released by the DWP and HMRC. Now given the district has been fortunate enough to have the philanthropy of the Roger De Haan Charitable Trust, even their generous financial interventions have done little to prevent more children sliding into both absolute and relative poverty over the last five years, within our district.
Report after report shows how health outcomes for children and adults in coastal communities makes them “old before their time“. A Roman fort public playground, would in small part, assist in changing such health and life outcomes for all children in the most deprived ward in the district. As a well known supermarket says “every little helps“.
At present there is a small playground on Jock’s pitch which measures approx 8m by 8m. Within this space there are three tired pieces of playground equipment and one bench, hardly inspiring or welcoming to children or parents.
This slideshow requires JavaScript.
In the most deprived ward in the whole district, such a proposal should we believe, be welcome. However adults raise their voices across social media and we hear nothing from the kids of the ward. This needs to change.
Yes there are issues, but all issues have a way of being resolved. Solutions need to be found, as no more children need slip into poverty in the district. Anything we can do to create improved outcomes for children in the most deprived ward in the whole district, should be welcomed.
Finally, it’s known that a significant contribution will be made to begin turning the proposal into a reality. Former KCC Cllr Dick Pascoe donated £20,000 of his grant money to push the proposal along. The idea of a roman fort public playground it is still a long way off the £300,000 funding needed, but is actively being sought, and knowing how doggedly determined some people are who are behind the proposal, that’s not such a mountain to climb.
In the immortal words of Santana – Let the children play.
No objection to improved playground but 83 parking spaces-NO!! Local children can walk or cycle to the area. This area is subject to coastal erosion and if overdeveloped will not survive for future generations of children. Please examine the councils proposals before you decide- phase 1 and 2 etc.
I loved the idea in principle when I read about it recently. The Roman Fort idea is very original. We have a few traditional play parks around, and the fantastic play park in the coastal park, so to have a Roman Fort on the East Cliff will be a great enhancement to the area. If it’s done with regard to historical accuracy it could also be used for educational purposes. There was also mention of a cafe and new toilets. I’m a pensioner so probably won’t play on the Roman Fort, but have often wished there was a place to get a coffee on the East Cliff. Not sure about the 83 parking places. If it’s paid parking it might help to pay for the project. That way local children can walk or cycle, visitors can help pay for it!
No one would begrudge an updated/improved/ proportionately bigger play area. However, Could someone explain what massively increased car parking, so-called “all weather” tennis courts (good luck with that when the wind is blowing as it regularly does), and a cafe will contribute to alleviating child deprivation – unless all these are to be provided gratis? Additionally, am I correct in thinking that the UK generally has a bit of a childhood obesity issue – not sure the encouragement of driving/being driven to get your exercise is the way forward.
This is a ludicrous idea. The deprived children can quite happily play football, cricket, rounders or fly a kit as I did on Jock’s Pitch some 60 years ago. Who needs a hugely expensive Roman Fort to play on. As for a play area increasing the value of properties this is more likely to reduce the value of those located nearby in that if it is successful there will be more noise and traffic and in due course it will become dilapidated when the novelty wears off. Then there is the loss of the Bowling greens which give a huge amount of enjoyment to many people and when they are gone they will be lost for ever. The council will not build any new ones. So do not destroy current amenities that have been successful for many years to replace them to satisfy what I believe is a minority interest with an ill founded idea. Spend the money on enhancing the area not on destroying it.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
Excellent article. Hope everyone reads it, and puts up the funds!
No objection to improved playground but 83 parking spaces-NO!! Local children can walk or cycle to the area. This area is subject to coastal erosion and if overdeveloped will not survive for future generations of children. Please examine the councils proposals before you decide- phase 1 and 2 etc.
I loved the idea in principle when I read about it recently. The Roman Fort idea is very original. We have a few traditional play parks around, and the fantastic play park in the coastal park, so to have a Roman Fort on the East Cliff will be a great enhancement to the area. If it’s done with regard to historical accuracy it could also be used for educational purposes. There was also mention of a cafe and new toilets. I’m a pensioner so probably won’t play on the Roman Fort, but have often wished there was a place to get a coffee on the East Cliff. Not sure about the 83 parking places. If it’s paid parking it might help to pay for the project. That way local children can walk or cycle, visitors can help pay for it!
No one would begrudge an updated/improved/ proportionately bigger play area. However, Could someone explain what massively increased car parking, so-called “all weather” tennis courts (good luck with that when the wind is blowing as it regularly does), and a cafe will contribute to alleviating child deprivation – unless all these are to be provided gratis? Additionally, am I correct in thinking that the UK generally has a bit of a childhood obesity issue – not sure the encouragement of driving/being driven to get your exercise is the way forward.
Well done to Cllr Dick Pascoe (Cons) for their foresight to push this along.
The actual play area is a good idea, the car parking is another blot on the landscape. What is Cllr Dick Pascoe business interests in this?
This is a ludicrous idea. The deprived children can quite happily play football, cricket, rounders or fly a kit as I did on Jock’s Pitch some 60 years ago. Who needs a hugely expensive Roman Fort to play on. As for a play area increasing the value of properties this is more likely to reduce the value of those located nearby in that if it is successful there will be more noise and traffic and in due course it will become dilapidated when the novelty wears off. Then there is the loss of the Bowling greens which give a huge amount of enjoyment to many people and when they are gone they will be lost for ever. The council will not build any new ones. So do not destroy current amenities that have been successful for many years to replace them to satisfy what I believe is a minority interest with an ill founded idea. Spend the money on enhancing the area not on destroying it.