Stodmarsh Nutrient Issue Update: Up to 50,000 homes per annum affected by Nutrient Issue in East Kent
It depends on your point of view, it could be a good thing or a bad thing.
The Stodmarsh Nutrient Issue rumbles on. According to Roland Cooper of Considine the issue is “affecting the construction of 33,000 to 50,000 homes per annum” being built across the five districts, affected by the issue, with a backlog of 25,000 to 30,000.
The councils areas within the River Stour Catchment Area are:
-
Ashford Borough Council
-
Canterbury City Council
-
Dover District Council
-
Folkestone & Hythe District Council
-
Maidstone Borough Council
You can be sure that no new schools or GP surgeries will be built with the builders claiming all their money has been spent on the water treatment. And if you believe that you’ll believe anything .
Their pockets and the pockets of the shareholders will be bulging
Natural England contacted Folkestone and Hythe District Council on 21 May 2020 to follow up from a call they had on May 13th notifying them of the problems at Stodmarsh. The pdf was online but I can no longer find the link (I have downloaded a copy).
It’s curious that Ashford Borough Council then rushed through the planning committee meeting for “Big Burton” aka Conningbrook Park in early June immediately adjacent to the Stour. It was approved by one vote, by everyone’s favourite councillor, Paul Clokie, despite legitimate reasons (it should not have been in the Local Plan in the first place).
I made a FOI request to Natural England regarding any communication between them and ABC prior to that committee meeting, and they could not find anything written.
The timing of that planning meeting seems very suspicious to me, since F&H who are much further upstream on the Upper (?) Stour, were made clearly aware of the problems at Stodmarsh at least 3 weeks before ABC’s planning committee meeting.
The problems at Stodmarsh, would likely have been the nail in the coffin of that development if it were proposed now.
@KT – exactly what I was thinking. Another excuse not to deliver infrastructure and affordable housing. The list of excuses that can be used in viability assessments has just got longer.
Does the recent ban on manure spreading by farmer in the aurtum help reduce phosphate/nitrogen run off? It has certainly been imposed if only to judge by the virtual disappearance of the silage smell in our are in the last 2 months.
https://www.fwi.co.uk/arable/crop-management/nutrition-and-fertiliser/environment-agency-seeks-to-uphold-autumn-muckspreading-ban