Site icon ShepwayVox Dissent is not a Crime

Folkestone & Hythe District Council Fails to Spend £11.88 Million on Promised Projects

Folkestone & Hythe District Council has left £11.88 million of budgeted capital spending unspent over the past two financial years. This money was earmarked for improving infrastructure and regenerating the district — but was never used. Official documents confirm that the funds were intended for projects like the seafront, environmental improvements, and economic development. However, due to delays in procurement, missed grant timelines, and internal planning problems, key initiatives have been repeatedly postponed.

What Is Capital Spending?

Local councils manage two main budgets:

The General Fund Capital Programme covers this second category: big-ticket, multi-year investments that aim to improve services, deliver regeneration, or build public infrastructure.

Actual Underspend: £11.88 Million in Two Years

A detailed look at the council’s records shows substantial underspending:

This means 29% of all capital funding approved by the council was not used for its intended purposes during the past two years.

Where Was the Money Supposed to Go?

The projects affected by the delays and deferrals include a wide variety of public services:

Seafront and Coastal Infrastructure

Community Facilities and Public Toilets

Lighting and Environmental Projects

Major Regeneration (Levelling Up Funding)

Business and Economic Development

Why Was the Money Not Spent?

The council has been candid about the reasons for the delays:

These delays are a recurring issue. For example, in 2023/24, £1.78 million earmarked for Otterpool Park wasn’t spent. In 2024/25, a further £420k for the same development was again deferred.

What About Borrowing and Receipts?

Despite the underdelivery:

This situation raises red flags: while no money is lost, the council is effectively carrying financial commitments for projects that haven’t happened.

Risks to Delivery and Deadlines

Many of the schemes rely on time-limited government grants. If the funding is not spent within required timeframes, it may have to be returned to Whitehall. This risk applies particularly to Shared Prosperity Fund and Levelling Up Fund projects.

The council insists that no borrowing is committed unless there is a confirmed scheme. Yet over £8 million in 2023/24 and over £3 million in 2024/25 was carried forward into the next financial year.

For Residents: Delayed Services, Deferred Benefits

The underspending may not look like a problem at first glance. After all, money hasn’t been wasted. But for residents, the consequences are real:

It also raises bigger concerns about the council’s internal capacity to plan and deliver large-scale projects on time.

Final Word: Delivery, Not Just Budgeting

Folkestone & Hythe District Council has ambitious capital plans — but ambition needs to be matched by delivery. The public expects that money approved for projects will result in actual improvements. The evidence from the last two years suggests a growing gap between intention and execution.

With over £11.88 million unspent, the priority for 2025/26 must be clear: turn budgets into bricks, and policy into progress.

We would be interested in hearing about your experiences of Fokestone & Hythe District Council. Email: TheShepwayVoxTeam@proton.me in confidence.

The Shepway Vox Team

Not owned by Hedgefunds or Barons

Exit mobile version