FHDC Temporary Accommodation Costs Soar as Homelessness Pressure Grows

Folkestone & Hythe District Council has already spent almost £1.38 million on temporary accommodation by the end of February, before March’s figures are even published. The payments data is stark enough on its own. But set beside the council’s recent procurement trail, it paints an even clearer picture of a system under sustained housing pressure rather than a one-off spike.

Folkestone & Hythe District Council’s temporary accommodation spending for April 2025 to February 2026 now stands at £1,379,647.27 once two additional procurement-card items of £90.00 and £97.89 are added to the ledger total. Those two small items were hidden in the procurement-card data, so they have been added into the overall figure.

That matters because March’s data has not yet been released. The council therefore needs only £120,352.73 in the final month of the financial year to pass £1.5 million for the full 2025/26 year. On the figures already in view, that is plainly possible. The average monthly spend across the eleven published months is about £125,422.48. In other words, a March broadly in line with the year-to-date average would be enough to push the total over that threshold.

The local pattern is severe. Before the two extra card payments are added, the spreadsheet total to the end of February comes to £1,379,459.38. February alone accounts for £255,244.50, making it the biggest month in the file. October was the next highest at £230,032.00, and June came in at £196,878.20. These are large numbers by any standard, and they show a bill that is not merely high but volatile.

The spending is also concentrated. Self Contained Nightly Lets account for £1,053,317.00 of the ledger total, while Bed & Breakfast Accommodation accounts for £326,142.38. By supplier, Paramount Independent Property Services LLP dominates the data on £1,053,317.00, followed by Westward Ho Hotel Limited on £100,152.00, Bluebells Guest House on £72,206.40, Gran Canaria Hotel on £34,644.00, and Charles Lucas Property Management Ltd on £32,310.00. So the big story here is not occasional hotel use at the margins. It is the cost of relying heavily on nightly-paid, stop-gap accommodation.

ShepwayVox had already identified the direction of travel before February’s data landed. Its February report stated that between April 2025 and January 2026 the council had paid £1,124,214.88 under the supplier-payment headings for temporary accommodation. The uploaded workbook matches that ten-month total, and February then pushes the figure far higher still.

What makes the updated picture more interesting is the procurement trail sitting behind it. In March 2024, FHDC awarded a contract titled “Provision of Emergency Accommodation 2024-25”. Contracts Finder shows a total contract value of £475,000, with a start date of 1 April 2024, an end date of 31 March 2025, and 7 suppliers.

A year later, the public notices show another arrangement. Contracts Finder records FHDC’s “Provision of Emergency Accommodation” contract as awarded on 7 April 2025, running from 8 April 2025 to 31 October 2025, with a total value of £400,000 and 10 suppliers. That is the £400,000 contract you flagged.

Then, in July 2025, the council went back to market again. Find a Tender shows a separate FHDC notice for “Provision of Temporary Accommodation” with an estimated value of £3.2 million excluding VAT, an anticipated start date of 1 October 2025, and extension options out to 30 September 2029. The notice says FHDC intended to appoint multiple suppliers using a tiered system based on lowest submitted room rates, and it expressly says there was “no guarantee of volume or exclusivity.”

The public trail also appears to run back further. FHDC’s contract-register search results show an entry for “Provision of Emergency Accommodation 2023-24” under reference DN702669, described as the provision of temporary emergency accommodation from various providers. The contract value for that entry was £300,000.

Taken together, those notices matter because they help explain why the payments ledger is so high without reducing everything to a simplistic “gotcha”. The contract notices show FHDC repeatedly procuring emergency or temporary accommodation from multiple providers across consecutive years. The payments spreadsheet shows what the council actually paid out in 2025/26 up to the end of February. Those are not the same thing. A contract notice value is not, by itself, the same as the final yearly cash paid to suppliers. But read together, they show a council repeatedly returning to the market because the pressure on homelessness services has not gone away.

That wider context is important, because this is not a crisis unique to Folkestone & Hythe. Official government statistics say 134,760 households were in temporary accommodation in England on 30 September 2025, up 7.0% on the same point a year earlier. The same release says 85,730 of those households included dependent children, and 175,990 children were living in temporary accommodation. So FHDC’s rising bill sits inside a national system that is already under intense strain.

That does not let the council off the hook. Residents are still entitled to ask hard questions about value for money, procurement, commissioning strategy, and whether enough is being done to reduce reliance on expensive nightly-paid placements. But the fairest reading of these figures is not that FHDC has stumbled into a freak overspend from nowhere. It is that the district is wrestling with the same brutal housing pressures seen across England, and that those pressures are now showing up very clearly in both the payments ledger and the procurement record.

The plain-English conclusion is this. FHDC has already spent nearly £1.38 million on temporary accommodation before March is counted. It is entirely possible that the final 2025/26 total could top £1.5 million once that last month is published. And when you set that against a £475,000 emergency accommodation contract for 2024/25, a £400,000 emergency accommodation contract for part of 2025/26, and a later £3.2 million temporary accommodation tender launched in 2025, the message is hard to miss: this is not a passing bump in the road. It is an expensive, ongoing pressure in a housing system that is still struggling to cope.

The Shepway Vox Team

Dissent is NOT a Crime