Is This The Man Responsible?

The Audit & Accounts Act 2003 ceased to be as of the 31/03/15. The SDC audit of their accounts 2014/15 were subject to this legislation in 2014/15.

Under s151 of the Local Government Act 1972 a local council is required to appoint an officer responsible for the administration of all its financial affairs. At the time of the Cllrs Inappropriate claims the s151 officer was according to the report at page 3

Tim Madden, Corporate Director Organisational Change, who was at the time of the complaint Section 151 Officer and therefore responsible for corporate financial probity.”

In the report “LOCAL INVESTIGATION CONCERNING COUNCILLOR PETER SIMMONS, A MEMBER OF SHEPWAY DISTRICT COUNCIL” it states at page 6:

Again the Audit report makes it clear in section 5 that the system of checking Councillors claims had been relaxed in the period of time leading up to the current case and had resulted in only spot checks being made.

These spot checks did not detect the issue with regard to the Subject Member’s claim forms and hence the size of the amount over claimed had increased with the passage of time.”

Mr Madden at that time was bound by the Audit and Accounts Act 2003 and especially s5 (4)(a) which states:

measures to ensure prompt and accurate recording of financial transactions, measures to prevent and detect inaccuracies and fraud and the ability to reconstitute any lost records, e.g. computer back up facilities.”

We at Shepwayvox cannot believe that for one minute that Mr Madden kept “prompt and accurate recordings of financial transactions” as the checking of Cllrs expenses “had been relaxed” and “resulted in only spot checks being made”

Now the legislation governing Mr Madden’s financial responsibilities were clear but alas due to a “relaxed” checking of Cllrs financial transactions by Mr Madden, it would appear that he was not carrying out his responsibilities in accordance with s5(4)(a) and therefore failed in his duties and responsibilities.

What we would ask is

1 Why were the checks relaxed when according to s5(4)(a) Mr Madden should have kept “prompt and accurate recordings of financial transactions”

2 What if any reprimand has Mr Madden received

3 At the most fundamental level of Mr Madden’s responsibilities it was his job to ensure robust systems of risk management and internal control, that financial control was exercised consistently, and that the SDC implemented appropriate measures to protect its assets from fraud and loss. It would appear Mr Madden failed to protect SDC financial assets from “loss”, so was he, and is he, fit for purpose to hold the office of s151 officer? What do you think?

Mr Milne’s report which cost us 6780.00 is severely lacking as it fails to look at the responsibility of the s151 officer. Has any internal reprimand been handed down to Mr Madden as it must be remembered he is now once again the responsible s151 officer and thus in charge of looking after the money. Do you feel safe that taxpayer’s money is back in the hands of Mr Madden?

If an bookkeeper such as Cllr Simmons was able to claim 210.15 of taxpayer’s money and Mr Madden (who to is an qualified accountant; which is vastly different from a bookkeeper) was not able to spot this “loss” what other money might SDC have “lost” under his stewardship?

Shepwayvox

Advertisements

2 Comments on Is This The Man Responsible?

  1. I wonder if Mr Madden or any of his staff were coerced by councillors?

    Why “spot checks”?
    When do “spot checks” take place?
    Who does the “spot checks”?

    Does this that there are 30 claims a month are being paid off without referencing and checking?

    And if there are extraordinary expenses such as “meetings and conferences” then surely whoever wants to make such a claim should be clearing this beforehand so that the paperwork follows a clear audit trail.

    Surely it wouldn’t have taken long to check 46 claim forms against a basic mileage and attendance list/chart and even less time following the recent culling of 46 councillors to 30 councillors.

    From this article it would appear that Shepway has a policy of “promoting to the level of incompetence achievable”.

    Like

  2. My experience is that SDC are not properly educated in this arena of ‘Checking’. I am not overly concerned about small anomilies in their cash account but am concerned, as a funding resident, that issues of legality are being rode roughshot over in our name.

    ML

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: