Yesterday, the Land Registry released all the title deeds of all tax haven/offshore companies which own property in the UK. There are, according to the Land Registry, 98,583 such properties owned by offshore companies in the UK in total. In Kent there are 1890 in Kent. And in Shepway there are 145. Of those, 22 are bits of property and land around the Eurostar terminal, owned by France-Manche, leaving another 123 properties owned outright by offshore companies based in tax havens.
Below is a graph setting out which tax havens the 123 properties are held in.
The British Virgin Islands tops the chart with 23 properties held here in Shepway by companies registered there. Missing out France, the next is the Isle of Man with 19 properties; which are all held by the colourful Geoffrey George Boot and partners, in his Isle of Man company, MF & L Ltd.
In the coming days we will release all the addresses, not just for Shepway, but for Kent too. As the data runs into 1.2GB, it will take some time to drill into and bring you the results. So please be patient.
Why does it matter that persons in Shepway own offshore property. It matters because there are tax advantages and it allows those who can afford it in Shepway to avoid paying certain types of taxes. The Paradise papers are Not about Tax. They do not focus on palm-tree islands strewn around the Caribbean. Their implications are not technical but political. The public who pay ALLtheir taxes in the UK are being denied the revenues they need for their hospitals and schools.
Drawing in part on data from last year’s Panama Papers and the HSBC files leaked in 2015, Gabriel Zucman recently co-published a study that found wealthy Britons have stashed £300bn in offshore tax havens – that is equivalent to 15% of our GDP.
Three hundred billion would more than cover our entire education budget for the rest of this decade and into the 2020s. Or, if you prefer, it is the equivalent of £350m being paid into the NHS every week for the next 16 years. Instead, it is funnelled offshore and used to buy yachts and property and other baubles – tax efficiently, of course.
The neoliberal economics so loved by David Cameron and George Osborne can be summed up very simply: punish the poor, but reward the rich for fear they will flee offshore.
This could be changed so easily and relatively quickly. Britain has ordered our overseas territories to decriminalise homosexuality and abolish the death penalty in the past. This lame Tory Government could, if it had the will, do exactly the same with tax transparency, in an Order of Council that, a senior London based tax lawyer recently told us, need be no longer than two sides of A4. But do you think it will happen, of course not. Theresa May has said she would rein in offshore excesses, but so far has delivered nothing at all. Empty vessels and all that.
It is clear from all the Tax leaks to date, the Tories are intent on rewarding the few not the many. There would be no need for the austerity Britian is suffering right now, if we brought that £300 billion back onshore. It would go a long way to solving a lot of problems the country is facing. It can be done, but we don’t suspect the Tories will be doing it any time soon.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
Good work, SV Team
Excellent article !!!
We have to wait for O’Jeremy Corbyn to sort all this out and hopefully we won’t be waiting for too long too..
My response to these spivs would be to refer them to the reply given in the case of Arkell v. Pressdram which can be found here http://www.lettersofnote.com/2013/08/arkell-v-pressdram.html