Cheriton Sports Ground: Running on Water?
You may remember an application being submitted by Folkestone Running Club during Christmas 2018 to build a running track on Cheriton Sports Ground.
Running Track – Google My Maps
18/1617/FH Planning application reference
It should be noted this came a year after both Folkestone Sports Centre Trust’s decision to sell off part of their golf course following Folkestone & Hythe District Council’s announcement they would be stopping the £150,000 a year grant the Sports Centre received in 2020, and the Council considering selling Folkestone Bowls Centre for £750,000.
Pent Valley Leisure Centre also closed in Summer 2017. Whilst the Sports Centre is set to get a revamped ski slope; and a aerial assault course, after the sale, a GoFundMe campaign started when they closed their doors during lockdown, hasn’t even raised 1% of its £250,000 target in the 7 months it has been running. This may leave you wondering how a non-profit community running club can afford to build a running track when other sporting facilities are struggling.
Interestingly, amongst the significant amount of objections was a comment from Furley Page Solicitors in April 2019, on behalf of their client, a neighbour, who were told the applicant, Folkestone Running Club,
-
“was not aware that the application had been made in their name.”
This would indeed be strange if true. However, the club shared a petition in July 2019 supporting the development that got nearly 800 signatures, which suggests that they were indeed behind it. Perhaps during a pandemic, they’re at an advantage having a wholly outdoor facility. We wish them well with their endeavour.
The application was successful, and work has recently commenced. However, we understand that they have already hit a snag.
The site is listed on Kent County Council’s Historic Environment Record as having several features of archaeological interest, some dating back to the Bronze Age, as well as on the Council’s interactive planning map as having ‘archaeological potential’. Despite it being flagged in the Archaeological Desk-Based Assessment that “archaeological remains of regional significance might be extant within the proposed development area” and the recommendation of “a programme of archaeological watching brief on any groundworks”, the officer’s report DCL/19/14 failed to recommend a condition regarding the watching brief, though it did mention the archaeological potential.
We understand that local residents flagged this with FHDC and KCC after having noticed that not only was the running track area being dug up, but a higher piece of ground that contains the remnants of St. Eanswythe’s Watercourse, which probably dates back to around the 11th-13th Centuries.
The ground has been owned by FHDC since Christmas Eve 2004, when the paid £750,000. The Council agreed a lease with Cheriton Road Sports Ground Trust on 6th July 2015, and runs to the 5th July 2036.
-
Surely the Council know what lies beneath their field?
‘Oversight’, a commonly expressed council word, particularly noted prior to New Romney housing developments, still materialising.
The local Archeological Society, in 1881, identified the Craythorn area as that of an 11th century Chancellery, complete with lead font and red tiled floors. However, council contracted ‘archeologists’ this century claimed there was nothing significant nor was the evidence supporting a Saxon fortification, nor the evidence of Winston Churchill, that William 1 massacred the saxons of New Romney, finally, not even The Anglo Saxon Chronicles, despite all noted to the council on their paperwork, could allow thorough investigation in to what may have been one of Britain’s most significant and preserved historical sites.
A potential benefit to the people of New Romney and Romney Marsh, for tourism, business opportunities and employment, permanently.
Remarkably, photographic evidence shows, even the German Luftwaffe, in 1940, knew more about the area than our own council, whereby two large rectangular formations were clearly visible plus water courses: we know the fortification was supplied by water from both an area along Hope Lane and from the sea in order to flood a defensive moat.
The defensive waterways were such that even today, in the area, contractors have been struggling with large water volumes, at great expense, where the water table can rise to just six inches from the surface.
There is much more, to this ‘oversight’.