Folkestone & Hythe Free Parking Plan Could Cost £356k

A proposal to give drivers 20 minutes’ free parking in Folkestone & Hythe town centre car parks has obvious public appeal. But a council report says the idea could cost up to £356,000 a year, increase enforcement pressure, and clash with climate and transport aims.

Twenty minutes’ free parking is the sort of policy that sounds almost too sensible to oppose. A resident wants Folkestone & Hythe District Council to consider it because some people may be put off quick high-street visits by having to pay for parking, especially when they only want to pop into a shop, collect something, or make a short appointment. The report to go before the Overview & Scrutiny Committee on 26th May, says the proposal is intended to support “struggling high streets” and respond to concerns about declining local activity

The case for the idea is clear. Free short-stay parking could make town centres feel easier to use, particularly for residents who don’t like, can’t use, or struggle with mobile-phone parking systems. The report says the proposal suggests short-stay free parking could “improve accessibility to local shops” and encourage short visits. For elderly residents, people without smartphones, or anyone fed up with downloading an app just to buy a pint of milk, that’s not a small point.

There’s also a business argument. The report accepts that reviews over the last 10 to 15 years have generally found free or cheaper parking can increase “short term footfall”, particularly in smaller towns and for convenience shopping. In plain English, fewer parking barriers may mean more people nipping into local shops rather than driving elsewhere or staying at home.

But the same report also makes clear that parking policy alone won’t save the high street. It says the wider causes of decline include online shopping, high rents and business rates, out-of-town retail parks, limited leisure offers, wider economic pressures and poor town-centre management. That matters because 20 minutes’ free parking may help at the edges, but it won’t by itself reinvent a town centre.

The financial warning is blunt. Officers estimate that introducing 20 minutes’ free parking in ten town centre car parks could reduce income by around £198,000 a year in the best-case scenario. If more motorists change their behaviour and avoid buying tickets for short stays, the annual loss could rise to approximately £356,000. The report says that represents around 11% to 20% of total car park income.

The reason is simple. Around 60% of users currently park for 30 minutes or one hour. If they can get 20 minutes free, and then benefit from the existing 10-minute grace period after a ticket expires, some may decide not to pay at all. The council’s risk isn’t just that it gives away 20 minutes; it’s that it accidentally creates a much wider free short-stay system.

The finance officer’s comments make the problem sharper. The report says there is “no provision within the approved General Fund Revenue budget” to absorb the loss. It also says there’s “no assurance” that surplus parking income will appear to offset it. Any shortfall would have to be covered by savings, reserves or other corrective financial action.

There are practical problems too. Free parking could increase demand for limited town-centre spaces, reduce availability for longer-stay shoppers, and increase vehicle turnover and congestion within car parks. It could also require more enforcement to stop misuse, including drivers taking repeated free sessions or staying beyond the free period without paying.

The implementation cost is modest by comparison, but not irrelevant. The report says signage, terminals and systems would need changing, with annual costs estimated at around £2,000. Extra enforcement costs are harder to quantify. If officers spend more time policing town centre car parks, the report warns that less enforcement resource may be available for coastal and rural locations.

There’s also a climate contradiction. The council’s own climate comments say 20 minutes’ free parking may encourage short car trips that might otherwise be made by walking, cycling or public transport. That could increase congestion and affect air quality in town centres, pulling against the council’s District Wide Carbon Strategy.

One of the oddest parts of the report is the equalities position. The legal comments say the council must consider the Equality Act 2010 and Public Sector Equality Duty, and that an Equality Impact Assessment should be considered because disabled users and others with protected characteristics could be affected. Yet the equalities section says there are “no diversities or equalities implications associated with this report”. Both statements can’t comfortably sit together without further explanation.

The report also reminds councillors that free parking isn’t absent from the district now. There’s already limited free on-street parking in Folkestone, Sandgate, New Romney and Hythe, plus a residents’ permit costing £80 a year or £20 a quarter, allowing up to three hours’ free parking in long-stay car parks and up to two hours in short-stay car parks each day.

So the real question isn’t whether 20 minutes free parking sounds good. It does. The question is whether councillors are willing to risk up to £356,000 a year, plus enforcement pressure and uncertain climate impacts, for a benefit the report says hasn’t been proven. A pilot scheme, tightly limited and properly measured, would be easier to justify than a permanent district-wide giveaway.

The Shepway Vox Team

Discernibly Different Dissent