The Shepwayvox Team has established that in less than three months, the gas contractor Gas Call Services Limited, (who started 01/11/19) issued all four councils with a dispute letter relating to the contract tender terms.
This matter remains unresolved as we understand from well placed sources inside FHDC, EKH and Gas Call Services Ltd.
It was announced yesterday staff at East Kent Housing (EKH) and the services it provides are set to transfer to the four councils that own it at close of play on 30 September (2020) this year.
The decision to break up EKH was made by councillors at all four councils at the start of the year following a consultation with tenants.
Approx 4,800 issues identified in fire risk assessments
Around 2,000 faulty emergency lights across all four Councils, as such Councils may be in breach of Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005
830 Electrical Installation Reports of which 230 unsatisfactory issues with both C1 Danger Present – Risk of Injury. Immediate remedial action required. Testing for C1 and C2 identified in 2016 and still not been rectified.
Lift servicing: 4 lifts non compliant for 575, 426, 393, 91 days.
Little or no action taken on 1,916 recommendations made on Legionella Risk assessments, of which 930 have been catergorised as high risk
Minutes show there remain a considerable number of issues, set above which need to be fully resolved before full compliance.
On the 8th August 2019 all four Chief Execs were “summonsed” to the Regulator of Social Housing in London to address the issues brought to light by the Shepwayvox Team’s investigation. Since then they have been addressing the issues raised by regulator. On the 29th Jan 2020 the Councils issued the Regulator with their detailed risk register and proposed mitigation report.
However, the Regulator is not just interested in the detailed risk register and proposed mitigation report. They are very interested in EKH staffing position too. The councils must send regular updates to the Regulator.
Regarding staff, EKH have had issues of recruitment over the last fifteen months or so, due in part to the publicity they received from our investigation.
The Councils have made it clear that to plug the vacancies EKH have, they hope many of the agency staffwho have been vital in supporting the organisation [EKH] during the period of fundamental change will want to go and work for one of the four councils when the services transfer in Sept 2020; and they will be working with them to make that happen.
Meanwhile, the contract tender terms remain in dispute and there is NODeborah Upton to blame, just the four Chief Execs. We hope they’ll resolve this issue swiftly. after all, losing one contractor to potential fraud was a misfortune, losing a second really would look like carelessness.
FHDC and CCC have been approached for a comment about the dispute letter, but at the time of publication a reply there has come none.
I am sure none of the Councils will want this dispute to go anywhere near a Court. I do not know what the contract states about dispute resolution but, if they have any sense it should include an arbitration clause. You may wish to submit an FOI request to obtain the necessary clarification.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
I am sure none of the Councils will want this dispute to go anywhere near a Court. I do not know what the contract states about dispute resolution but, if they have any sense it should include an arbitration clause. You may wish to submit an FOI request to obtain the necessary clarification.