Detail, detail detail, the devil is in the detail. From the evidence publicly available it would appear for the former St Saviour Hospital reserved matters planning application, detail has been forgotten.
The site sandwiched between the Seabrook Rd, and Cliff Rd in Hythe (Kent), is owned by Classic Hospitals Property Ltd, who are ultimately owned by the Spire Healthcare Group Plc. Classic Hospitals purchased the site on the 15 Sept 2005, for £7,359,800, according to the land registry. By Sept 2015, the site closed down as it was deemed too expensive to modernize
Within a year of closure a year a planning application for 47 new one, two and three-bedroom apartments on the land rising north of the A259 was submitted under application Y16/0794/SH. This was approved on 22 Nov 2019, and the first condition was that work on the Dutch House element would be started within 3 years of this date.
That aside we note condition 19 restricts ANY works, including vegetation clearance, until a detailed reptile mitigation report / strategy is approved.
This appears to have been submitted in 22/1431/FH/CON. We note KCCs ecological advice for Condition 19, as of the 10 Nov 2022 and uploaded to the Council planning portal on the 14 Nov 2022, states:
We advise that insufficient information has been provided to discharge the condition (19)
No reptile survey has been carried out which would have enabled us to consider if the reptile population (if present) within the site could be supported by a receptor site of that size.
We advise that the additional information submitted to address the above point is not sufficient to satisfy us why the proposed approach is appropriate.
We advise that information addressing the above concerns must be submitted prior to the discharge of the condition.
A fortnight later on the 24 Nov 2022, two days after planning permission would appear to have expired, KCC Ecological advice states:
We highlight that due to the time of year the reptile mitigation can not commence until March/April when the weather will reach temperatures of at least 9 degrees to ensure that any reptiles present are active.
meaning condition 19 would not be meet until Mar/Apr 2023, some five months after planning permission had expired.
As of today, 29 Dec 2022, condition 19 has NOT been signed off, and work as we understand it has not commenced.
Three years has elapsed, from the original decision taken on the 22 Nov 2019. No work has commenced by 22/23 November 2022 (whichever it is), and as such the main application has surely expired?
As a result, we and no doubt others, question how the applicants agent could possibly have submitted these reserved matters.
If this is a faux pas by Folkestone & Hythe District Council planning department, as it appears to be, the developer should take heart. They are not alone and most certainly not being singled out by any potential incompetence within the planning department, as asimilar situation has occurred over at Bigginswood in Cheriton.
Detail, detail, detail, the devil is in the detail.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
This would appear to be a fault with the Enforcement Dept.